Collar
A collar is three positions: shares already held, a bought put below the price and a written call above it, on the same expiry, one contract of each per 1,000 shares. The put caps the loss until expiry; the call gives up every gain above its strike, and its premium pays for some or all of the put. The most that can be lost is the fall to the put strike plus any net cost. It is built for the owner of a large, low-cost holding who wants a fixed worst case for a few months without selling, and so without realising the gain, and who accepts a ceiling on the upside in exchange.
The position: Rolls-Royce shares, a 1,300 put and a 1,550 call
The worst case is the fall to the put strike plus the net cost and the £1.40 to sell or exercise the put: (1,300p − 1,400p) × 1,000 = −£1,000, less £150.30, less £1.40, which is −£1,151.70, 8.2% of the holding. The best case is the rise to the call strike less the net cost: £1,349.70 at 1,550p, and £1,348.30 above it, where the call is assigned and the £1.40 assignment commission applies. Breakeven is 1,400p plus the 14.75p net premium, 1,414.75p (1,416.03p after both legs’ half-spreads and commissions). Per share, the floor sits at 1,284.97p and the cap at 1,534.97p once the net cost is counted.
One rule is structural, not a convention: shares held must at least equal the contract size times the calls written, and any calls beyond that are uncovered. One standard RR contract is 1,000 shares; one RR mini (8RR) is 100. A holder of 1,000 shares can write one standard call or ten minis against them, and a call written against shares held with a different broker is not covered in the account that holds the call.
Floor, cap and the path between them
The solid line is the collar on 16 October against where RR settles. The dashed and dotted lines value the same position on 27 August and on the day it is opened: with both options still holding time value, the position moves far less than the shares on either side of 1,400p, which is the point of it.
On the skew line the model gives 31.8% to RR finishing below 1,300p, where the floor is in use, 29.4% to it finishing above 1,550p, where the cap is, and 38.8% to the range between (model probability, risk-neutral, lognormal, from the skew line, on the share price less the dividend’s present value, 1,394.02p). The floor is more likely to be reached than the cap in this model, and the skew prices the put accordingly.
Which call pays for the put: the zero-cost table
The question every collar starts with is how high the cap can go before the call no longer pays for the put. The table prices three floors on three expiries and solves, on the same model, for the call strike whose premium equals the put’s. ICE sets RR’s listed strikes, and we found no published table of strike intervals (checked 26 September 2026), so the 50p steps in the last column are an assumption: the live chain decides which strikes exist.
Three endings on 16 October, and the 30-day trap
The worked plan holds the collar to expiry because it was opened for a dated purpose, and follows three conventions: it sells an in-the-money put rather than exercising it, so the shares are kept; it lets an in-the-money call be assigned rather than buying it back, because the cap was agreed at the start; and at expiry it either sets a new collar around the new price or stops. Each costs something, shown in pounds below. The endings are scenarios, not forecasts.
Base: RR at 1,450p
Both options expire worthless. The shares are up £500.00, the put cost £556.40 and the call brought in £406.10: £349.70 overall, which is (1,450p − 1,414.75p) × 1,000 less the £2.80 of commission. The option legs together are −£150.30, a net allowable loss, on a holding that rose.
Adverse: RR at 1,150p
The put is 150p in the money. The convention fires: the plan sells it for £1,498.60 after commission, a gain of £942.20, and keeps the shares, which show −£2,500.00 unrealised. Overall the result is −£1,151.70, the worst case. Exercising the put instead would have sold the shares at 1,300p, turning the unrealised gain into a realised one. The sting is in the tax: £942.20 on the put plus £406.10 on the call is £1,348.30 of chargeable gains, £242.69 at 18% or £323.59 at 24%, in a quarter when the holding lost money, because the £2,500 fall in the shares is not a loss until they are sold.
Favourable: RR at 1,700p
The call is assigned at 1,550p and the 1,000 shares are delivered. The collar makes £1,348.30; the shares alone would have made £3,000.00, so the cap cost £1,651.70 of gain. Buying the call back on expiry day to keep the shares would have cost £1,501.40 and turned the call’s grant into a loss of £1,095.30: the plan’s convention accepts the assignment instead. For tax, the grant and the sale become one transaction (TCGA 1992 s144(2)(a); CG12313, CG12317): proceeds of £15,904.70 (the strike plus the premium, less both commissions) against the £3,517.50 pool give £12,387.20, and the lapsed put’s £556.40 loss brings the 2026/27 result to £11,830.80: £2,129.54 at 18% or £2,839.39 at 24% with the annual exempt amount used elsewhere.
The 30-day trap: buying the shares back
Suppose the holder wants Rolls-Royce back and buys 1,000 shares at 1,700p on Monday 26 October, ten days after the assignment, for £17,085.00 including £85.00 of stamp duty (commission left out). Shares acquired within 30 days after a disposal are matched with that disposal before the pool is touched (TCGA 1992 s106A; CG51560). So the 16 October sale is measured against the 26 October purchase, not the 350p pool.
A large gain becomes a loss for the year, and the gain has not gone: it waits in the old pool cost, to be taxed when the shares now held are sold. Re-buying therefore moves the gain into a later year rather than removing it. HMRC can deny a loss created by arrangements whose main purpose is a tax advantage (TCGA 1992 s16A; CG13350). The general rule, with a covered-call example, is on the tax examples page.
Closing both legs a week early
On Friday 9 October, with RR at 1,400p and seven days left, the put is worth 1.87p and the call 0.20p (model). Selling the put at 1.75p gives a loss of £540.30; buying the call back at 0.25p costs £3.90 with commission, which is added to the grant’s costs (s148), leaving a grant gain of £402.20. That is two computations, a net −£138.10, and the holding is unprotected from that day. Rolling the collar on to a later expiry is the same two closing trades plus two opening ones (the tax of a roll).
Greeks: 1,000 shares that move like 387
At entry the two options almost cancel each other’s sensitivity to volatility (vega £0.08) and to time (theta £0.24 a day), and they cut the holding’s delta from 1,000 to 387. That number is not fixed. With RR unchanged it climbs back towards 1,000 as both options lose their time value: 528 by 27 August and 927 a week before expiry, when the collar behaves almost like the bare shares until RR nears a strike. After an instant fall to 1,173.60p the put dominates, delta falls to 266 and vega turns positive (£14.55); after an instant rise to 1,670.07p the call dominates and vega turns negative (−£17.09). The 27 August column also leaves out the £60.00 dividend the holder received on the way.
The 6 August dividend and the written call
The holder keeps the shares, so the holder keeps the dividend: 6.0p, £60.00 on 1,000 shares, taxed as dividend income. The dividend is also in the option prices. RR was expected to fall by 6p on the ex-date, so the put is worth 55.44p against 53.65p without the dividend, and the call 40.86p against 42.70p: together the collar costs 3.63p a share more because of it.
A written American call can be exercised early, just before an ex-date, when the dividend is worth more to the holder of the call than the time value given up. An options intermediary with stamp duty relief compares the two directly; a private holder who exercises also pays 0.5% stamp duty on the strike, 7.75p a share here (early exercise before an ex-date). On Wednesday 5 August, 72 days before expiry, simple interest on the 1,550p strike alone was worth 11.47p a share, well above the 6.0p dividend, and even at 1,700p the call would have been worth 187.43p, 37.43p more than its intrinsic value. Early assignment for this dividend was not a live risk at any share price. It would be with a week to go: interest on the strike over seven days is 1.11p, so an in-the-money call with little time value left can be exercised the evening before the ex-date, and the holder then delivers the shares without the dividend.
Collar, put, put-spread collar or covered call
The same 1,000 shares, the same chain and the same 16 October expiry, handled four other ways. Each changes a different number.
The put-spread collar is the version that pays the holder to take it on, and the reason is in the worst-case column: below 1,150p the written put gives back the protection, so the holding loses in full again. It covers a fall of up to 18%, to 1,150p, not a collapse, and on the numbers here it trades £213.60 of cash (a £63.30 credit against a £150.30 cost) for the loss of cover below 1,150p.
Selling in stages across 5 April instead
One reason to collar rather than sell is to avoid realising a large gain in a single tax year. The alternative to compare it with is selling in stages, using the annual exempt amount and the unused basic-rate band in more than one year. The figures below are for a reader with £35,000 of taxable income in each year and no other gains, a departure from the site’s usual assumption that the exempt amount is used elsewhere, because using it is the point here. They assume 2026/27 rates and allowances apply in 2027/28 too.
Splitting the sale across 5 April saves this reader £826.94: the gain in each year is smaller, more of it falls inside the exempt amount, and all of what remains fits in the unused basic-rate band at 18%. The cost is market risk on the shares kept, and that is where a collar and the sale can work together. On the 500 shares waiting for April, standard contracts do not fit, but RR has a 100-share mini (8RR), so five minis collar exactly 500 shares. On 8 July the minis listed were the front three months and the next three quarters (July, August and September, then December 2026, March and June 2027), so cover past 6 April means the June 2027 series. Priced for the 18 December 2026 minis (163 days, same skew line) as an example, the 1,300 put at 78.00p (model 78.09p) and the 1,550 call at 66.50p (model 66.61p) cost £57.50 in premium for five minis, plus £17.00 of commission at £1.70 a contract, a stand-in, because IBKR’s UK price list shows no separate rate for minis: £74.50, of which commission is 23%. The same strikes on one standard contract would cost £117.80 for 1,000 shares, £58.90 per 500. The minis are listed on ICE; the site could not confirm that UK brokers offer them or that they trade with a two-way quote, so that is a question for the broker.
UK tax: two legs, two dates, one holding
Each leg is taxed on its own date. Writing the call is a disposal of the call on the day it is written: the premium less costs is a gain in that tax year (TCGA 1992 s144(1)). If the call lapses, that gain stands; if it is bought back, the cost is added to the grant’s costs (s148); if it is assigned, the grant and the share sale become one transaction on the assignment date, and tax already charged on the grant is set off. The bought put is an ordinary disposal when sold and an allowable loss when it lapses (s144(4)); exercised, it sells the shares and its cost comes off the proceeds (s144(3)(b)). None of this touches the shares’ unrealised gain unless a leg delivers them. Option computations go under “Other property, assets and gains” on the SA108 and the share sale under listed shares (which boxes); each rule is worked on the tax examples page.
A collar opened in March 2027
The two legs can land in different tax years. Take a collar opened on Monday 1 March 2027 for the Friday 16 April 2027 expiry (46 days), with RR assumed at 1,400p that day, an assumption for the illustration, and no ex-date in its life. The 1,300 put costs 27.75p (model 27.73p) and the 1,550 call brings 17.00p (model 16.91p). The call’s grant is a 2026/27 gain of £168.60, taxed at £30.35 or £40.46, although the position ends in 2027/28. If both options lapse on 16 April, the put’s £278.90 loss falls in 2027/28: it cannot be carried back against the 2026/27 gain, so the relief is deferred a year, and lost only if it is never used. If RR has fallen to 1,150p and the put is sold on 16 April, its £1,219.70 gain belongs to 2027/28. If the call is assigned in April instead, the grant joins the share sale on the assignment date, which moves the premium out of 2026/27; a 2026/27 return is corrected only if it was filed before then (positions across 5 April).
Tight collars and disguised interest
A collar with its put and call strikes close together fixes the return, and a fixed return can be taxed as income. The disguised-interest rules charge income tax on a return economically equivalent to interest (ITTOIA 2005 s381A; legislation.gov.uk); the exception for arrangements involving only shares (s381E) does not cover shares combined with options. The collar on this page, with the floor 7.1% below and the cap 10.7% above the price, leaves the result to depend on where RR ends; a collar with both strikes at or near 1,400p would lock in a return close to the interest rate and is the kind of arrangement the rules describe. HMRC’s capital gains manual (CG12310) still points to the older provisions that these replaced in 2013.
Employee shares, closed periods and dealing codes
Some large, low-cost holdings are employee shares, and for those the question comes before the price. A director or other person discharging managerial responsibilities (a PDMR) may not deal on their own account in the company’s shares or linked derivatives during the 30 calendar days before an interim or year-end report (UK MAR Article 19(11)); options over the shares are linked derivatives, so a collar can be neither opened nor adjusted then unless the company grants one of the narrow exceptions in Article 19(12), and a PDMR’s dealings are notified once they reach €5,000 in a year. A company’s own dealing code can go further and forbid employees from hedging company shares at all, and share-plan rules can forbid hedging awards that have not vested. The plan rules and the dealing code, not a broker’s willingness to take the order, decide whether a collar is allowed. Holders of US shares, such as vested awards from a US employer, face 100-share contracts priced in dollars, with each leg converted to pounds on its own date for tax (two dates, two rates); a dollar collar protects the dollar price, not its value in pounds (US options from the UK).
Costs, the Rolls-Royce contracts and the account
Open this worked example in the strategy builder (1,000 RR shares at 1,400p, the 1,300 put at 55.50p and the 1,550 call at 40.75p, 100 days, with the 6.0p dividend). Because the builder uses European pricing, it backs each leg’s volatility out of these fills rather than using the tree values.
How these numbers are calculated
The build checks each of these figures against the engine again whenever the site is rebuilt.