Skip to main content
Trust · Standards

Editorial standards

Every page on UK Tax Drag is written, reviewed, and maintained against the standards on this page. They're public because they're meant to be held against us — if you find content that doesn't meet them, that's a correction we want to make.

UK Tax Drag is a UK personal finance publication producing educational content on tax, pensions, investing, property, and life-event money decisions. We follow seven editorial standards: accuracy first, primary-source citation, transparent methodology, no affiliate revenue, visible review dates, specialist content review, and open corrections. Every page links to our corrections policy and the methodology that documents how it was built.

The seven standards

1. Accuracy first

Every figure, threshold, rate, allowance, deadline, and calculation cited on the site is checked against the primary source (HMRC, ONS, OBR, FCA, NS&I, the Pensions Regulator, GOV.UK, or the legislation itself) before publication. We use 2026/27 tax-year figures throughout, refreshed each Spring Budget. Calculator outputs are tested against HMRC's official tools where available, and against published worked examples for cases HMRC doesn't directly publish.

2. Primary-source citation

Every editorial page that quantifies anything (rates, allowances, thresholds, eligibility tests) links to the underlying primary source at the bottom under "Sources and methodology." We link directly to GOV.UK guidance, HMRC manuals, FCA handbooks, and primary legislation rather than to secondary commentary.

3. Transparent methodology

The methodology page documents how every calculator is built, the inputs it expects, the formulas it applies, the assumptions it makes, and the test cases it's verified against. The methodology is updated each tax year and any breaking change is logged in the changelog.

4. No affiliate revenue

UK Tax Drag has zero affiliate commercial relationships with brokers, banks, IFAs, accountants, pension providers, or investment platforms. We have never accepted, and will never accept, payment in exchange for editorial coverage, ranking, or recommendation. The single exception is the editorial recommendation of Maze Tax Services, where the page explicitly discloses the no-payment relationship and personal trust basis. See how we make money for the full funding model.

5. Visible review dates

Every content page on UK Tax Drag carries a visible "Last reviewed by the UK Tax Drag editorial team" line with the date of last editorial check. If the date is older than 12 months from your current date, treat the page as potentially out of date and verify any figures against HMRC. We don't publish content we're not committed to keeping current.

6. Specialist content review (forthcoming named experts)

Currently, all content is reviewed by the UK Tax Drag editorial team — anonymously by design until our named expert panel comes on board. We have chartered accountants and FCA-authorised advisers being onboarded to review and co-author specific content areas (pensions, tax compliance, complex CGT, IHT planning). When that scaffold is in place, individual pages will carry the named reviewer's credentials and the byline will reflect the specialist who signed off. See our editorial team page for the current structure.

7. Open corrections

If a published page contains a factual error, calculation error, or out-of-date figure, we welcome corrections from readers. The corrections policy documents the route to report, the response time we commit to, and how corrected pages are marked. Substantive corrections are logged with the page's review history.

What this means for you, the reader

What this site is NOT

To be explicit about the boundaries:

Editorial independence

UK Tax Drag is independently owned and operated. We are not part of, owned by, or financially connected to any UK or international financial services firm, bank, broker, accountancy firm, regulator, or government department. Our funding model (transparently documented at how we make money) is display advertising via Google AdSense, with no affiliate revenue, no sponsored content and no paid placements.

Conflict of interest disclosure

Where any potential conflict of interest exists — e.g. the editor of UK Tax Drag has used a particular platform — we disclose this on the relevant page. Currently active disclosures:

No other disclosures currently apply. If our position changes (we onboard advertisers other than display AdSense, accept paid placements, develop affiliate relationships), the change will be disclosed here and on individual affected pages before any change in editorial content.

How we publish and review at scale

UK personal finance is unusual in that meaningful coverage genuinely requires breadth. A reader on a £40,000 salary, a reader on £125,000, a reader on a BR tax code, a reader on a K-prefix code, and a reader weighing a Class 3 voluntary NI top-up are each looking for a specific answer, not a generic article — so the site has a dedicated page for each of those questions and many more like them. Coverage is broad on purpose; it is not a substitute for editorial care.

Every page in a programmatic cluster — for example the £25k–£200k take-home pages, the why-is-my-tax-code-* explainers, or the per-city cost-of-living pages — carries per-page editorial commentary that is unique to that figure or that case. The £60,000 take-home page is the only page on the site that explains the HICBC interaction at that income; the £125,000 page is the only one that walks through the 60% trap escape arithmetic; the BR tax-code page is the only one that distinguishes second-job-correct from main-job-overpayment. The shared scaffolding (calculator, breakdown table, sources, sibling links) is identical across the cluster; the analytical core is not.

Our publication priority is maintenance over expansion. New pages are added when a real reader question is not yet answered well, not on a calendar. Every page carries a visible last-reviewed date, the editorial team byline, the corrections policy and the sources behind the figures. When HMRC, ONS, FCA or the Bank of England update a number we model, the affected pages are re-reviewed and re-dated; the change is recorded in the changelog. Material errors are corrected publicly under the corrections policy.

If you find a page that does not meet that bar — boilerplate that does not say anything new, a figure that has moved, a calculation that does not match the worked example — we want to know. Email editorial@uktaxdrag.co.uk or use the contact form, and we will fix it.

Updates to these standards

These editorial standards are a living document. When they change materially — e.g. we adopt a new sourcing rule, change the corrections process, develop a new disclosure category — the change is logged below with the date. Minor copy-edits are not logged.

DateChange
12 May 2026Initial publication of editorial standards as a separate page (previously a section in About).

Trust documents on UK Tax Drag