Skip to main content
Investing · LISA

The 25% LISA withdrawal penalty explained

The Lifetime ISA's headline pitch is the 25% government bonus. The headline risk is the 25% penalty if you withdraw for any reason other than a first home or retirement. But the 25% penalty on the withdrawal value isn't just the bonus being clawed back — you actually lose more than you gained. Here's the maths, the qualifying-withdrawal rules, and when paying the penalty is still rational.

5-minute read

What is the 25% lisa withdrawal penalty?

Quick answer: If you withdraw money from a LISA before age 60 for any reason other than buying a first home or being terminally ill, you pay a 25% government withdrawal charge . This is calculated on the withdrawal value (your contributions + bonus + growth), not just the bonus. The result: you lose…

Key points:

If you withdraw money from a LISA before age 60 for any reason other than buying a first home or being terminally ill, you pay a 25% government withdrawal charge. This is calculated on the withdrawal value (your contributions + bonus + growth), not just the bonus. The result: you lose 6.25% more than you originally contributed, not the 25% you might expect. Worked example: contribute £4,000, receive £1,000 bonus, withdraw £5,000, pay 25% × £5,000 = £1,250 penalty. Net to you: £3,750 — meaning a £250 loss on your original £4,000 contribution.

The arithmetic of the penalty

The HMRC penalty rate of 25% is applied to the gross withdrawal amount, not the bonus. This creates the asymmetry — the bonus you receive (25% of contribution) is smaller in cash terms than the penalty (25% of bonus-inclusive withdrawal).

StepAmount
Your contribution£4,000
Government bonus (25%)£1,000
Account value£5,000
Withdrawal charge (25% of £5,000)−£1,250
Net to you£3,750 (£250 loss)

Algebraically: net cash = 1.25C × (1 − 0.25) = 0.9375C where C is your contribution. So 6.25% is lost vs. just saving in a standard ISA. Plus you've forgone any growth on the lost portion.

The three qualifying withdrawal events

No penalty applies if the withdrawal meets one of three statutory criteria:

"First-home" is defined strictly: you must not currently own (or have previously owned) any residential property anywhere in the world. Even a 1% share inherited from a relative disqualifies you.

The £450,000 cap problem

The LISA first-home limit is £450,000. If you buy a property for more than £450,000, you can use the LISA — but you trigger the 25% penalty on the full withdrawal value. The cap hasn't moved since 2017 despite house-price inflation, making LISAs increasingly impractical for buyers in London, the South-East, and parts of the South-West.

If your target property is £460,000, sticking £40,000 of LISA money in is functionally a £37,500 contribution after the penalty (loss of 6.25%) — almost certainly worse than the same money in a Cash ISA earning interest.

When paying the penalty is still rational

Three scenarios where withdrawal-with-penalty makes sense:

Common mistakes to avoid

If you're 39 and considering opening

You can only open a LISA between ages 18 and 39. Contributions stop at age 50. From 50 to 60, the account just grows — no contributions, no penalty risk. If you're 39 and saving for a first home, opening a LISA is almost always rational — even if you only contribute £1 to lock in the option to use it later before age 50.

The £1 trick: open the LISA with £1 today; you've now satisfied the 12-month rule going forward. You can choose later whether to use it for first home or retirement, or both.

Sources and methodology

The figures and rules above follow HMRC's Lifetime ISA guidance. For a personalised calculation, see the LISA calculator. For comparison with other ISA types, see Cash vs S&S vs LISA and the complete ISA guide. The methodology page documents sources.

Editorial accountability
Open Trust Centre →

Every page is reviewed against the editorial standards, written from primary sources, sourced openly, and corrected publicly. No affiliate revenue. No sponsored content. No paid placements.

Editorial standards Editorial process Corrections policy How we make money Editorial team Methodology