Skip to main content
UK SIPP platform guide · 2026/27

Best UK SIPP platform for 2026/27

SIPP (Self-Invested Personal Pension) platforms charge differently from ISA platforms — usually with higher fee caps because pensions can hold larger balances over longer horizons. The right SIPP depends heavily on portfolio size, whether you plan to drawdown, and whether you want a flat-fee or percentage model.

6-minute read
About this comparison UK Tax Drag has no commercial relationship with any provider listed on this page. There are no affiliate links, no referral codes, and no sponsored placements. Fees and features are accurate as of 2026-05-12 based on each provider’s published website. Always verify current fees on the provider’s site before opening an account — charges change frequently.

What you need to know: Best UK SIPP platform for 2026/27

Quick answer: For most UK SIPP investors in 2026/27: Vanguard SIPP wins on cost above £100k (0.15% capped at £375/yr). AJ Bell SIPP is the best mid-balance choice (0.25% capped at £120/yr for shares/ETFs). Interactive Investor (£12.99-£21.99/mo flat) wins decisively at £250k+ portfolios. Below £50k, robo-advisor SIPPs may make sense for hands-off investors.

Key points:

For most UK SIPP investors in 2026/27: Vanguard SIPP wins on cost above £100k (0.15% capped at £375/yr). AJ Bell SIPP is the best mid-balance choice (0.25% capped at £120/yr for shares/ETFs). Interactive Investor (£12.99-£21.99/mo flat) wins decisively at £250k+ portfolios. Below £50k, robo-advisor SIPPs may make sense for hands-off investors.

The 6 main UK SIPP platforms

PlatformSIPP platform feeDealingDrawdown feeMin investment
Vanguard SIPP0.15% capped at £375/yr£0 funds; £7.50 ETFs (manual)£0£500 / £100 monthly
AJ Bell SIPP0.25% funds (no cap); 0.25% shares/ETFs capped £120/yr£5 (£1.50 regular)£0 on drawdown setup; £25/ETF transfer to drawdown£25
Hargreaves Lansdown SIPP0.45% funds (tapered); 0.45% ETFs capped £200/yr£11.95 (£5.95 regular)£0£100
Interactive Investor SIPP£12.99-£21.99/mo flat (depending on plan)£3.99/trade (free trades included in plan)£0£25/mo
Freetrade Plus SIPP£11.99/mo£0£0£2
InvestEngine SIPP0% on DIY; 0.25% on managed£0Drawdown not yet available£100

SIPP cost over 30 years at different balances

Balance / strategyBest platform~Annual cost
£25,000 mostly fundsVanguard SIPP£37.50
£100,000 mostly fundsVanguard SIPP / AJ Bell SIPP£150 / £250
£100,000 mostly ETFsVanguard SIPP / AJ Bell SIPP£150 / £120
£250,000 mostly fundsVanguard SIPP£375 (capped)
£250,000 mostly funds (Interactive Investor)Interactive Investor Pension Builder (£12.99/mo)£156
£500,000 mostly ETFs (flat-fee winner)Interactive Investor£156-£264
£1m+ portfolio (flat-fee wins)Interactive Investor Pension Builder£264/yr regardless of balance

The crossover where Interactive Investor’s flat fee beats Vanguard’s capped 0.15% sits around £200k-£260k portfolio. Above that, Interactive Investor is the cheapest serious option.

Drawdown considerations — sometimes more important than accumulation fees

If you’re within 10-15 years of retirement, the drawdown fee structure matters as much as accumulation fees. Most SIPPs charge nothing to enter drawdown today (post-2018 regulatory pressure), but ongoing drawdown costs vary:

PlatformDrawdown ongoing feeUFPLS / flexi-access setup
Vanguard SIPPSame 0.15% platform fee£0 setup, supports both UFPLS and flexi-access
AJ Bell SIPP0.25% (no cap on funds; £120 cap on shares)£0 setup, supports both
HL SIPP0.45% tapered; ETF cap £200£0 setup, supports both
Interactive Investor£12.99-£21.99/mo flat continues£0 setup
Freetrade Plus£11.99/mo continuesUFPLS only, no flexi-access

For a £300k SIPP in drawdown, the annual cost difference between Interactive Investor (£156-£264) and HL (~£1,350) is ~£1,000-£1,200 a year. Over a 25-year retirement that compounds to £30,000+ of difference.

Decision framework by balance and stage

Best for SIPP £0 - £50k

Best for: Early-career savers building a pension

Vanguard SIPP (0.15%) for fund-heavy. InvestEngine SIPP (0%) for ETF-only. Both offer free transfers in to consolidate old pots from previous jobs.

Best for SIPP £50k - £200k

Best for: Mid-career pension builders

Vanguard SIPP at the lower end (still capped at £375). AJ Bell SIPP for share/ETF investors valuing the £120 cap. HL SIPP if you value research and service and have already chosen HL ISA.

Best for SIPP £200k - £500k

Best for: Senior career with consolidated pensions

Interactive Investor Pension Builder (£12.99/mo = £156/yr). Flat fee beats any percentage model at this balance. Trade-off: dealing fee per trade after monthly free.

Best for SIPP £500k+

Best for: High-net-worth pension

Interactive Investor at £21.99/mo (more trading included) = £264/yr regardless of balance. The fee gap vs HL at this balance is £2,000+/yr.

Best for hands-off pension

Best for: Investors who want managed portfolio

Nutmeg SIPP (0.75% managed, dropping to 0.35% above £100k). Higher fees but full management. Reasonable case for £50-200k balances where management is genuinely valued.

Mistakes when choosing a SIPP

Plan your pension contributions

The pension annual allowance calculator handles tapering, carry-forward, and employer contributions. The salary sacrifice calculator shows the most efficient contribution method.

Open the AA calculator →

How we built this comparison

Fee and feature data is taken directly from each provider’s published website as of 2026-05-12. UK Tax Drag has no commercial relationship with any platform listed — no affiliate links, no referral codes, no sponsored content. The methodology page documents our comparison standards. The independence page confirms our funding model.

This page is educational only and is not regulated financial advice. The choice of platform depends on your personal circumstances, investment style, and balance. Always read the provider’s key facts document and verify the latest fees before opening an account. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. Investments can fall as well as rise.

Editorial accountability
Open Trust Centre →

Every page is reviewed against the editorial standards, written from primary sources, sourced openly, and corrected publicly. No affiliate revenue. No sponsored content. No paid placements.

Editorial standards Editorial process Corrections policy How we make money Editorial team Methodology