Skip to main content
Ltd Co · Dividend waivers · 2026/27

UK dividend waivers and anti-avoidance (2026/27)

A dividend waiver lets one shareholder formally give up their right to a dividend, allowing remaining shareholders to receive a larger share. This is sometimes used to direct income to lower-rate family members. But the settlements legislation (s624 ITTOIA 2005) and the "Arctic Systems" case mean HMRC can reclassify the waived income back to the original shareholder — wiping out the tax saving and potentially adding penalties.

6-minute read

Dividend waivers in one paragraph: a shareholder can formally waive their entitlement to a dividend, allowing other shareholders to receive more. Used legitimately to fund the company or to support family members at lower tax rates. But HMRC scrutinises waivers under the settlements legislation (s624 ITTOIA 2005) — if the arrangement looks like a tax-avoidance scheme, the waived amount is taxed as if you'd received it. The classic risk: husband waives, dividend goes to lower-rate wife; HMRC reclassifies and bills husband at higher rate.

What is a dividend waiver?

A formal renunciation of a shareholder's right to a declared (or future) dividend. Mechanically:

Importantly, the company doesn't "redirect" the dividend to other shareholders — the waived dividend simply isn't paid. The remaining dividend pool gets distributed pro-rata to the non-waiving shareholders.

When are waivers used?

The settlements legislation: s624 ITTOIA 2005

The settlements legislation applies when an arrangement creates a "settlement" — broadly, a transfer of property where the settlor retains a significant interest. HMRC's view:

The line: waiving once in unusual circumstances may be fine. Repeatedly waiving in a pattern that benefits the same lower-rate beneficiary is a settlements problem.

The Arctic Systems case (Jones v Garnett 2007)

The most-famous case in this area. Mr Jones owned 100% of Arctic Systems Ltd as an IT contractor. He transferred half the shares to his wife (a non-active director). He paid himself a small salary and large dividends. The dividends were split 50/50 between him and his wife — using her basic-rate allowance.

HMRC argued this was a settlement under s624. They lost. The House of Lords held:

So sharing dividend income through shares between spouses is generally OK provided the shares are outright transfers. But waivers are different — a waiver doesn't transfer the underlying share; it just renounces one specific income payment. HMRC has greater scope to apply the settlements legislation to waivers.

When does HMRC challenge a waiver?

HMRC's published view (BIM44030+) flags concerns when:

Conversely, HMRC is more relaxed about:

The two-thirds tax saving requirement

HMRC's specific worry: if the waiver effectively doubles the lower-rate spouse's dividend, the tax saving is substantial:

HMRC may argue this is a settlement and tax £20,000 of the wife's dividend as the husband's income. Result: £6,750 of tax due, no saving. Plus potential penalties.

What makes a waiver more defensible?

Worked example: where it fails

Mrs Y is full-time director. Mr Y owns 30% of shares but does no work. Mrs Y owns 70%. Both higher-rate taxpayers. Company has £100,000 distributable profit. They want to give £40,000 to Mr Y to use his basic rate band.

If Mrs Y just declares the dividend: 70/30 split = £70,000 to her, £30,000 to him. She pays £18,225 dividend tax; he pays £8,775. Total: £27,000.

If Mrs Y waives half her dividend: declared dividend is £100,000 but Mrs Y's 70% portion of £70,000 is waived in half. So she gets £35,000 and Mr Y gets... still his £30,000 + her waived £35,000 = £65,000.

HMRC analysis: this is a husband-and-wife arrangement, with the income earner (Mrs Y) waiving in favour of non-active spouse (Mr Y). Settlements legislation applies. The £35,000 is taxed as Mrs Y's income.

Result: no saving; potentially penalty plus interest on the previously-undeclared tax.

Worked example: where it works

TechCo has three founders, each with 33% shares. Investor takes 20% via a fundraising round. Founders agree to waive future dividends until the investor has recovered their investment.

HMRC analysis: this is a commercial arrangement between unrelated parties. The waiver-givers don't have a family connection to the beneficiary. No settlements challenge.

The waivers stand and the investor receives the full dividend pool.

Practical mechanics of a valid waiver

  1. Board declares the proposed dividend.
  2. Shareholder signs a deed of waiver BEFORE the dividend is officially declared and paid.
  3. Deed is dated, witnessed, and kept in the company's statutory books.
  4. The waived dividend is not paid; remaining dividend is paid pro-rata to non-waiving shareholders.
  5. If HMRC inquires, the company can show: contemporaneous deed, commercial reason, no related-party benefit pattern.

Common waiver mistakes

Sources

Related content for Ltd company directors

Editorial accountability
Open Trust Centre →

Every page is reviewed against the editorial standards, written from primary sources, sourced openly, and corrected publicly. No affiliate revenue. No sponsored content. No paid placements.

Editorial standards Editorial process Corrections policy How we make money Editorial team Methodology