Skip to main content
Investing · ETFs · Tools

ETF Tools Map

Six different ETF tools exist on UK Tax Drag, plus a set of editorial decision frameworks. They all do different things, but the boundary isn't always obvious. This page is the routing layer: pick the question you're trying to answer, find the right tool.

UK Tax Drag has 4 interactive ETF tools and multiple editorial frameworks. The tools generate answers from data; the frameworks teach you how to think about the asset class. They work together. The fastest route to the right one: identify whether your question is about discovery (which ETFs exist?), comparison (are these two/three the same?), portfolio fit (what does this look like together?), or understanding (what does this metric/category even mean?).

The 4 interactive tools

ToolUse when you're asking...Output
ETF Browser"What ETFs exist in [category]?"Filterable list of ETFs by asset class, geography, structure
ETF Compare"How do these specific tickers differ?"Side-by-side comparison of selected ETFs across OCF, AUM, yield, holdings
ETF Builder"What does my whole portfolio look like together?"Weighted-portfolio view of cost, yield, beta, concentration, region mix
ETF Overlap Checker"Am I accidentally owning the same stocks twice?"Estimated overlap between two or more ETFs by holdings

The editorial decision frameworks

These are not tools — they're written guides that teach you how to think about a specific asset class or product family. Use them before the comparison tools, to know what questions you should be asking.

The reference + transparency layer

Underneath the tools and frameworks sits the transparency layer — exactly what data is used, how each metric is calculated, and what the limitations are.

The "best of" pages — when to use them

Five "best of" pages exist, each with explicit, narrow selection criteria — not subjective rankings.

Each "best" list documents its own selection criteria. Click through to see the exact filters used — we're not aggregating subjective rankings.

The portfolio templates — when each fits

TemplateBest for
One-fund globalBeginners, small accounts, low-maintenance preference
Cautious coreLower-risk savers, pre-retirees focused on capital preservation
iShares starterInvestors committed to the iShares ecosystem
Income portfolioRetirees + near-retirees prioritising yield
Drawdown portfolioRetired investors structuring decumulation

The most common journeys

Journey A — "I want one global ETF and that's it"

  1. Read one-fund vs modular framework.
  2. Open best global ETFs.
  3. Run final candidates through ETF Compare.
  4. Decide. Done.

Journey B — "I want to build a 3-5 ETF portfolio"

  1. Read 3-fund portfolio guide.
  2. Pick candidates from best global, best bond.
  3. Test in ETF Builder.
  4. Check overlap with overlap checker.
  5. Review tax fit per wrapper matrix.

Journey C — "I need income"

  1. Read income framework first — understand the 3 buckets.
  2. Choose your bucket.
  3. Open best income ETFs for that bucket.
  4. Compare via ETF Compare.

Journey D — "I want to understand a metric I keep seeing"

  1. Quick definition: metrics glossary.
  2. Full transparency including formula: metrics transparency hub.
  3. Per-metric deep dive (linked from the hub).

Sources and methodology

The tools draw on the data documented in the ETF Data Methodology. Every metric is fully transparent — see the Metrics Transparency hub. UK Tax Drag does not earn commission from any ETF provider — see how we make money. The site methodology documents the broader review process.

ETF deep-dive reading list

When you need to go beyond the calculators, these pieces explain the mechanics behind the most-asked ETF questions UK investors have.

Editorial accountability
Open Trust Centre →

Every page is reviewed against the editorial standards, written from primary sources, sourced openly, and corrected publicly. No affiliate revenue. No sponsored content. No paid placements.

Editorial standards Editorial process Corrections policy How we make money Editorial team Methodology