Skip to main content
Robo-advisor comparison · 2026/27

Nutmeg vs Wealthify vs Moneyfarm: which UK robo-advisor?

Robo-advisors take the platform-plus-fund-selection decision out of investors' hands — you answer a risk questionnaire and the platform builds and rebalances a portfolio for you. The three biggest UK robo-advisors charge meaningfully more than DIY platforms, but offer simplicity and automatic rebalancing in return.

5-minute read
About this comparison UK Tax Drag has no commercial relationship with any provider listed on this page. There are no affiliate links, no referral codes, and no sponsored placements. Fees and features are accurate as of 2026-05-12 based on each provider’s published website. Always verify current fees on the provider’s site before opening an account — charges change frequently.

Wealthify is the cheapest of the three robos at 0.6% management fee + ~0.16% fund OCF = ~0.76% all-in. Nutmeg and Moneyfarm sit around 0.95-1.00% all-in for active/managed portfolios. All three are well below human financial advisers (1-2% + fund costs) but well above DIY ETF investing on Vanguard or Trading 212 (~0.20-0.30% all-in). Robo fees are reasonable for “hands-off” investing but compound expensively over decades.

The three robo-advisors compared

NutmegWealthifyMoneyfarm
Owned byJP MorganAvivaAllianz (Italy / UK)
Management fee — managed portfolio0.75% (<£100k); 0.35% (above)0.60%0.75% (<£10k) → 0.35% (above £500k)
Management fee — fixed allocation0.45%0.60% (no fixed)0.45%
Average fund OCF~0.20%~0.16%~0.20%
Typical all-in cost~0.95% managed / 0.65% fixed~0.76%~0.95% on first £10k, sliding
Min investment£500£1£500
WrappersISA, JISA, LISA, SIPP, GIAISA, JISA, GIAISA, JISA, SIPP, GIA, Pension consolidation
Portfolio range10 managed / 5 fixed / 5 SRI5 risk levels / Ethical option7 risk levels
UK-regulated since201120162016 (UK arm)
FSCS protectedUp to £85,000Up to £85,000Up to £85,000

The cost gap vs DIY over 30 years

Robo-advisor fees seem small annually but compound brutally over decades. Same £500/month, same 7% nominal market return, same 30-year horizon:

PlatformAll-in annual costPot after 30 yearsVs DIY benchmark
Trading 212 / InvestEngine DIY0.07-0.22%~£580,000(benchmark)
Vanguard Invest0.22%~£574,000−£6,000
Wealthify0.76%~£517,000−£63,000
Nutmeg / Moneyfarm~0.95%~£492,000−£88,000
Traditional adviser (1.5%)1.5%~£436,000−£144,000

So choosing Moneyfarm over Trading 212 for a 30-year £500/month plan costs around £88,000 in lost compound growth. The question is whether that “cost of managed convenience” is worth it for your specific situation.

When robo-advisors make genuine sense

When robo-advisors are not worth it

Decision framework

Choose Wealthify if you...

Best for: ...want the cheapest robo, are happy with 5 risk levels, want JISA available

Wealthify is 0.6% mgmt vs 0.75% at Nutmeg/Moneyfarm under £100k. The Aviva ownership gives it institutional backing. Portfolio range is the simplest of the three.

Choose Nutmeg if you...

Best for: ...want LISA wrapper, want most portfolio variety, value JP Morgan backing

Nutmeg offers a managed Lifetime ISA — rare for robo-advisors. The 10 managed + 5 fixed + 5 SRI = 20 portfolios is the broadest range of any UK robo. JP Morgan’s 2021 acquisition added institutional reassurance.

Choose Moneyfarm if you...

Best for: ...want pension consolidation help, prefer human contact, are aiming for <£10k starter then large balance

Moneyfarm offers actual investment consultants you can speak to — a hybrid robo / adviser model. Pension consolidation is included for SIPP customers.

Choose none of them if you...

Best for: ...already understand ETF investing and have a single goal

A single ETF on Trading 212 or Vanguard achieves 90% of what a robo-advisor delivers at 10-25% of the cost. The case for robos is convenience, not performance.

Decide between DIY and robo

The ISA vs GIA calculator and pension calculator show how fees compound over your specific horizon — the real cost of paying for managed convenience.

Open the pension calculator →

How we built this comparison

Fee and feature data is taken directly from each provider’s published website as of 2026-05-12. UK Tax Drag has no commercial relationship with any platform listed — no affiliate links, no referral codes, no sponsored content. The methodology page documents our comparison standards. The independence page confirms our funding model.

This page is educational only and is not regulated financial advice. The choice of platform depends on your personal circumstances, investment style, and balance. Always read the provider’s key facts document and verify the latest fees before opening an account. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. Investments can fall as well as rise.

Editorial accountability
Open Trust Centre →

Every page is reviewed against the editorial standards, written from primary sources, sourced openly, and corrected publicly. No affiliate revenue. No sponsored content. No paid placements.

Editorial standards Editorial process Corrections policy How we make money Editorial team Methodology