OCF
Useful, but not decisive on its own.
- A lower OCF is good, but not if the fund is doing the wrong job.
- Tracking difference and securities lending can matter as much as the fee line.
- Do not mistake the cheapest fund for the cleanest choice.
A premium ETF process starts with the factsheet, not the marketing line. The professional question is always the same: what job is this fund actually doing, what frictions come with it, and what could make it behave differently from the neat label on the front?
Use this page when you are holding a factsheet in front of you and want to know which lines matter most before committing capital.
| Read this first | Why it matters | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Fund objective and index tracked | This tells you the actual job of the ETF before you even care about fees. | Comparing two funds that are not solving the same problem. |
| Domicile, structure and replication | This affects tax treatment, counterparty exposure, and how closely the fund may behave to the headline benchmark. | Assuming every ETF is just a physically held basket of shares. |
| Holdings and sector concentration | The top ten holdings often reveal whether you are buying genuine diversification or a narrow style tilt. | Buying a "global" label that is really a concentrated US mega-cap exposure. |
| Distribution policy and wrapper fit | Accumulating versus distributing matters more outside wrappers than many people realise. | Treating acc and dist funds as interchangeable in a GIA. |
Useful, but not decisive on its own.
Headline income can hide structural trade-offs.