ETF toolkit / Metrics glossary

ETF metrics glossary: what the numbers are really trying to tell you

Metrics are only useful when they answer a real portfolio question. This glossary keeps the definitions tied to decisions rather than letting jargon float around detached from the portfolio job.

ETF hub Compare tool Builder Overlap checker Model portfolios Metrics glossary

Core metrics

Risk

Beta

How sensitive an ETF is to broad equity-market moves. Beta is useful for portfolio balance, not as a quality score.

Risk-adjusted return

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility. Helpful for comparing broad funds with similar jobs, less useful across very different sleeves.

Downside focus

Sortino ratio

Like Sharpe, but cares more about bad volatility than total volatility. Useful when the drawdown profile matters more than the wiggles.

Cost

OCF

Ongoing Charges Figure. A good starting cost metric, but not the whole ownership cost once spread and tracking difference matter.

Cashflow

Distribution yield

Useful only when the income stream is the real job. Never treat a high yield as proof that the fund is better.

Bond risk

Duration

How sensitive a bond ETF is to interest-rate moves. Longer duration usually means more rate sensitivity.

Structure and implementation terms

Tracking

Tracking difference

The real gap between the fund return and the index return. In practice this often matters more than obsessing over a tiny OCF difference.

Tracking

Tracking error

How consistently the fund deviates from the benchmark over time. Relevant when precision is the job.

Structure

Physical vs synthetic

Physical funds hold the assets directly or through sampling. Synthetic funds use swaps. Neither is automatically bad; the question is whether you understand the structure.

Currency

Hedged vs unhedged

Hedging changes the ride. It is not a free lunch: you are trading currency noise for hedging cost and a different return path.

Cashflow

Accumulating vs distributing

Share-class choice changes cashflow handling, tax admin and rebalancing convenience, even when the underlying portfolio is similar.

Fund scale

AUM

Assets under management. Bigger is not always better, but tiny specialist funds deserve a closure-risk check.